Will AI take over my job? It’s the question every web designer has been side-eyeing for the last year. So I decided to actually put it to the test.
I’m a Squarespace and Showit designer with 100+ websites under my belt, and I recently tested three of the most talked-about AI tools (Claude, ChatGPT, and the new Claude Design feature) to see if they could design a real client website better than I could. Below is exactly what happened, what surprised me, and the honest verdict on whether AI is coming for our jobs anytime soon.
Spoiler alert: it’s complicated.
Want to design a website that actually converts (with or without AI)? Grab my free Brand & Website training right here. It walks you through the SEO, design, and strategy stuff AI still can’t do for you.
Yes, AI tools like Claude and ChatGPT can generate functional website code in minutes, but the output is generic and rarely converts as well as a custom-designed site.
That’s the short answer. Now let’s get into the real test.
For each AI tool, I gave it the same prep my real clients give me: a full brand questionnaire (ideal client, homepage messaging, about page direction), her existing website copy, brand colors and fonts, and a few fun facts about her personality. In other words, I didn’t go in cold. I gave the AI more context than most DIYers ever would.
Here’s what happened with each one.
I asked Claude to design a homepage for a real client of mine: a photographer in the metro area whose ideal clients are seniors and families. The first output came in about 30 minutes.
The good news: it used her brand colors. The bad news: it was blocky, flat, and looked nothing like the bright, fun, colorful vibe her ideal client responds to.
So I tried again. I uploaded reference designs from websites with the energy I wanted. I added photos. I gave it more direction. The second pass was better. The code was clean, the layout would technically convert, and the “15 years in the metro” callout was a nice touch.
But it still felt blocky. There was no movement, no personality, no waviness or flow that matched her brand. And one more thing worth knowing: every time I wanted to tweak something, I had to go back into Claude, ask it to update the code, copy the new code, and paste it back into the website builder. Clunky doesn’t begin to cover it.
Time spent on the AI version: about 30 minutes Time spent on my professional Showit version: about 2.5 hours (including the client call)
The professional version had movement, personality, and matched her brand vibe perfectly. Was it slower? Yes. Will it convert better? I’d bet money on it.
ChatGPT performs similarly to Claude for web design. It generates functional, SEO-optimized code, but the result still feels jagged and impersonal compared to a custom build.
I tested ChatGPT on a high-ticket sales page for a client whose ideal clients are real estate agents earning serious money. After a couple of hours of back-and-forth prompts, ChatGPT produced a long, mobile-optimized sales page with proper SEO settings. I was honestly impressed that it auto-generated meta descriptions and image alt text without me asking.
But here’s where it fell apart: the design was jagged. High-ticket offers need breathing room, white space, and a sense of luxury. ChatGPT’s version felt cramped and generic. My professional Squarespace version flowed better, gave the eye places to rest, and matched the high-end positioning her ideal client expects.
If you’re selling something at a premium price point, “good enough code” isn’t good enough. Design choices signal trust before anyone reads a word of your copy.

Claude Design is a new Claude feature that lets you set up a custom brand design system, then generates full multi-page websites based on your colors, fonts, and brand vibe.
To test it, I uploaded my logo, my font files, full-page screenshots of my current website, and a brief on what my brand is about. (Pro tip: if you don’t have screenshots ready, the GoFullPage Chrome extension takes a full-page screenshot in one click like the one on the right.)
Claude Design built out a design system with my colors, font choices, and even some component examples. Then I asked it to design a five-page website (home, about, services, blog, contact) for Rebekah Read Creative.
What surprised me: it came up with all five pages. The structure was logical. The hierarchy was decent.
What did NOT surprise me: it screamed AI. The font wasn’t quite right (it didn’t recognize my actual font, even though I uploaded it). The layouts were missing the wave dividers that are core to my brand. And the pages were full of emojis as visual dividers, which is one of the dead giveaways that AI designed something. Please, for the love of everything, do not put emojis as section breaks on your professional website.
The backend setup was cool. The output? Still felt like every other AI website I’ve seen.
AI will not replace strategic web designers in 2026, but it will replace generic template-based work that ignores brand strategy and conversion design.
What AI is genuinely good at:
What AI still cannot do well:
If your only goal is “I need a website that exists,” AI can probably get you there. If your goal is “I need a website that brings in clients while I sleep,” strategic design and SEO matter way more than how fast the code generates.
Use AI as a starting point, not a finished product. Pair AI-generated layouts with real brand photography, intentional design choices, and SEO strategy for actual results.
If you’re a DIY entrepreneur on a tight budget, here’s how I’d actually use AI for your website:
If you want a website that ranks on Google and brings in clients without you posting on Instagram every day, you need three things: smart design, conversion-focused copy, and SEO. AI is currently weakest at the first two and only okay at the third.
Will I be out of a job in a year? Probably not. Will the bar for what counts as a “good website” rise as more people use AI to make functional ones? Absolutely.
The web designers who survive (and thrive) over the next few years are going to be the ones who lean harder into strategy, brand, and SEO. Not just pretty layouts. Anyone can get a pretty layout from Claude in 30 minutes. What people can’t get from AI is a website built around their specific business model, their actual ideal client, and a long-term plan to bring in traffic.
For DIY business owners reading this: don’t let the AI hype convince you that you can skip the strategy. A fast, functional website that doesn’t rank on Google or speak to your ideal client is basically a digital business card. You deserve more than that.
If you’re DIY-ing your website in 2026, you don’t have to figure it all out alone. My free Brand & Website training walks you through the strategy and SEO foundation that AI still can’t replicate.
Grab the free training right here.
And if you’d rather just have a real human build your website for you, my Website in a Day service might be a better fit. Take a peek at my work and packages here.
The future of the web is humans and AI working together. Use the tools, but don’t outsource your strategy to them. Your business is too important for that.
Hey, I'm Bekah! Web designer, Squarespace Circle Gold Partner, marathon runner, and mama of two. I built Rebekah Read Creative in 2018 after leaving corporate America, and I've spent the years since helping purpose-driven entrepreneurs stop cringing at their websites and start getting found on Google.
I'm the kind of person who overshares, processes out loud, and goes all in on whatever has my heart, whether that's running a 50k or building someone's website in a single day. Quality coffee and real conversations are basically my love language.